Canon RF 100-300mm F2.8L IS USM vs Canon RF 400mm F2.8L IS USM

Canon RF

Two f/2.8 L telephotos for Canon RF, both stabilized (up to 5.5 stops), dust and water resistant and compatible with the RF 1.4x and 2x extenders. The RF 400 f/2.8 L (July 2021) is the classic super-tele prime at 2.9 kg and 367 mm long. The RF 100-300 f/2.8 L (May 2023) is, according to Canon, the lightest f/2.8 zoom that reaches 300 mm. At about 2.6 kg it is slightly lighter than the 400.

In return the prime offers more reach: 400 mm against 300 mm, and up to 800 mm against 600 mm with the 2x extender. The zoom covers everything from 100 mm.

Which one suits whom?

  • RF 100-300: You shoot sports or events at varying distances and want to zoom flexibly at f/2.8.
  • RF 400: You have fixed positions, for example in a stadium or for wildlife, and need the reach without an extender.

Key differences

  • Focal length: 100-300 mm on the Canon RF 100-300mm F2.8L IS USM, 400 mm on the Canon RF 400mm F2.8L IS USM.
  • The Canon RF 100-300mm F2.8L IS USM is 240 g lighter (2,650 g vs 2,890 g).
  • The Canon RF 100-300mm F2.8L IS USM is 44 mm shorter.
  • The Canon RF 100-300mm F2.8L IS USM focuses closer: from 180 cm instead of 250 cm.
  • Filter thread: 112 mm on the Canon RF 100-300mm F2.8L IS USM, 52 mm on the Canon RF 400mm F2.8L IS USM.

Specs side by side

The key specs of both lenses side by side.

LensCanon RF 100-300mm F2.8L IS USMCanon RF 400mm F2.8L IS USM
Focal length100-300 mm400 mm
Max. aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Weight2,650 g2,890 g
Filter diameter112 mm52 mm
Min. focus distance180 cm250 cm
Length323 mm367 mm
Autofocusyesyes
Image stabilizationyesyes

Size comparison

  • Canon RF 100-300mm F2.8L IS USM: 323 × 128 mm
  • Canon RF 400mm F2.8L IS USM: 367 × 163 mm

Side view to the same scale, length × diameter (without lens hood).

LensFinder.org

I update the database regularly. If you should find any wrong info, miss a lens or wish there was a new feature, I appreciate your feedback. Thank you! 🎉 To the feedback form

Mastodon