Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VR vs Tamron SP 15-30mm F/2.8 Di VC USD

Nikon F-Mount

Both wide-angle zooms for Nikon F full frame have image stabilization, but they differ in speed and weight. The Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 Di VC USD (September 2014) offers constant f/2.8 and starts at 15 mm. As with other very wide zooms, it has a bulging front element without a filter thread. It weighs 1100 g. The Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR (February 2010) is a stop slower, but takes 77 mm filters, reaches 35 mm and weighs about 680 g.

So you trade a stop of light and 1 mm of wide angle for filter options, reach and less weight.

Which one suits whom?

  • Nikon 16-35mm: You work with screw-in filters or travel with light luggage.
  • Tamron 15-30mm: You want f/2.8 with stabilization for interiors, events or landscape and accept the weight.

Key differences

  • Focal length: 16-35 mm on the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VR, 15-30 mm on the Tamron SP 15-30mm F/2.8 Di VC USD.
  • The Tamron SP 15-30mm F/2.8 Di VC USD is faster: f/2.8 instead of f/4, about 1 stops more light.
  • The Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VR is 420 g lighter (680 g vs 1,100 g).
  • The Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VR is 20 mm shorter.

Specs side by side

The key specs of both lenses side by side.

LensNikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VRTamron SP 15-30mm F/2.8 Di VC USD
Focal length16-35 mm15-30 mm
Max. aperturef/4f/2.8
Weight680 g1,100 g
Filter diameter77 mm–
Min. focus distance28 cm28 cm
Length125 mm145 mm
Autofocusyesyes
Image stabilizationyesyes

Size comparison

  • Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VR: 125 × 83 mm
  • Tamron SP 15-30mm F/2.8 Di VC USD: 145 × 98 mm

Side view to the same scale, length × diameter (without lens hood).

More comparisons

LensFinder.org

I update the database regularly. If you should find any wrong info, miss a lens or wish there was a new feature, I appreciate your feedback. Thank you! 🎉 To the feedback form

Mastodon